<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple TV: Why?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.elharo.com/blog/mac/2007/03/25/apple-tv-why/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.elharo.com/blog/mac/2007/03/25/apple-tv-why/</link>
	<description>Ranting and Raving</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:38:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mokka mit Schlag &#187; Mac Mini to be Discontinued? Say it isn&#8217;t so!</title>
		<link>http://www.elharo.com/blog/mac/2007/03/25/apple-tv-why/comment-page-1/#comment-77082</link>
		<dc:creator>Mokka mit Schlag &#187; Mac Mini to be Discontinued? Say it isn&#8217;t so!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 19:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elharo.com/blog/mac/2007/03/25/apple-tv-why/#comment-77082</guid>
		<description>[...] a cable card, and DVR software; and the Mac Mini could become the digital hub that AppleTV so much isn&#8217;t. We need more Minis, not less. Please Apple: don&#8217;t kill the Mini.  &#171; NetBeans 6.0 M9 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a cable card, and DVR software; and the Mac Mini could become the digital hub that AppleTV so much isn&#8217;t. We need more Minis, not less. Please Apple: don&#8217;t kill the Mini.  &laquo; NetBeans 6.0 M9 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph E. Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.elharo.com/blog/mac/2007/03/25/apple-tv-why/comment-page-1/#comment-57275</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph E. Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elharo.com/blog/mac/2007/03/25/apple-tv-why/#comment-57275</guid>
		<description>I bought one for the following purposes:

1. As a convenient way to host and display a library of children&#039;s videos that are repeatedly watched and where the physical media is always scratched and destroyed quickly.

2. To easily display family photos on a large screen.

3.  For video podcasts, trailers, and (maybe later) other downloads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought one for the following purposes:</p>
<p>1. As a convenient way to host and display a library of children&#8217;s videos that are repeatedly watched and where the physical media is always scratched and destroyed quickly.</p>
<p>2. To easily display family photos on a large screen.</p>
<p>3.  For video podcasts, trailers, and (maybe later) other downloads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VHF</title>
		<link>http://www.elharo.com/blog/mac/2007/03/25/apple-tv-why/comment-page-1/#comment-57269</link>
		<dc:creator>VHF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 17:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elharo.com/blog/mac/2007/03/25/apple-tv-why/#comment-57269</guid>
		<description>You are not the market for this product. It is more like an iPod for the living room. First and fore most the content everyone is complaining about is likely pulled from web sites or via P2P without copyright permission. Expecting full support every codec under the sun  isn&#039;t realistic given the lawyers involved in any content player( or for that matter Apple&#039;s own need to push the iTunes store )....

Yes, it is overpriced and it doesn&#039;t do everything we want. But for many it is exactly what they want, which is an easy way to bring content to their living room. I might even consider it if it was $99 rather than $299. 

It would be nice if the hardware and content verdors got together and really fixed the mess that has become of the living room entertainment system and maybe we were expecting too much in hoping Apple could do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are not the market for this product. It is more like an iPod for the living room. First and fore most the content everyone is complaining about is likely pulled from web sites or via P2P without copyright permission. Expecting full support every codec under the sun  isn&#8217;t realistic given the lawyers involved in any content player( or for that matter Apple&#8217;s own need to push the iTunes store )&#8230;.</p>
<p>Yes, it is overpriced and it doesn&#8217;t do everything we want. But for many it is exactly what they want, which is an easy way to bring content to their living room. I might even consider it if it was $99 rather than $299. </p>
<p>It would be nice if the hardware and content verdors got together and really fixed the mess that has become of the living room entertainment system and maybe we were expecting too much in hoping Apple could do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://www.elharo.com/blog/mac/2007/03/25/apple-tv-why/comment-page-1/#comment-57259</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 13:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elharo.com/blog/mac/2007/03/25/apple-tv-why/#comment-57259</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m still waiting for a method to play *in iTunes* the Xvid avis that can be found on Bittorrent.

Anyone?

Colin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still waiting for a method to play *in iTunes* the Xvid avis that can be found on Bittorrent.</p>
<p>Anyone?</p>
<p>Colin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliotte Rusty Harold</title>
		<link>http://www.elharo.com/blog/mac/2007/03/25/apple-tv-why/comment-page-1/#comment-57180</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliotte Rusty Harold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 04:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elharo.com/blog/mac/2007/03/25/apple-tv-why/#comment-57180</guid>
		<description>If they want to cut out the cable companies they&#039;re going to have do a lot better job of delivering a lot more content. They don&#039;t have 1% as much content as the cable company or even my local BlockBuster does. + Cable and satellite companies often give away boxes to sell subscriptions.  Apple&#039;s charging big bucks for the box.

I just don&#039;t see how the AppleTV is any way competitive with cable and satellite. Would you consider replacing your cable with an AppleTV? Would anyone? Until Apple can provide 100+ channels 24 hours a day, seven days a week including my local channels, they aren&#039;t even playing the same game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they want to cut out the cable companies they&#8217;re going to have do a lot better job of delivering a lot more content. They don&#8217;t have 1% as much content as the cable company or even my local BlockBuster does. + Cable and satellite companies often give away boxes to sell subscriptions.  Apple&#8217;s charging big bucks for the box.</p>
<p>I just don&#8217;t see how the AppleTV is any way competitive with cable and satellite. Would you consider replacing your cable with an AppleTV? Would anyone? Until Apple can provide 100+ channels 24 hours a day, seven days a week including my local channels, they aren&#8217;t even playing the same game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry Kindall</title>
		<link>http://www.elharo.com/blog/mac/2007/03/25/apple-tv-why/comment-page-1/#comment-57144</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Kindall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 03:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elharo.com/blog/mac/2007/03/25/apple-tv-why/#comment-57144</guid>
		<description>Apple doesn&#039;t want to put a TV tuner into the box, they want you to download your TV programming from them. They want to cut out the cable and satellite companies, not work with them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple doesn&#8217;t want to put a TV tuner into the box, they want you to download your TV programming from them. They want to cut out the cable and satellite companies, not work with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Patterson</title>
		<link>http://www.elharo.com/blog/mac/2007/03/25/apple-tv-why/comment-page-1/#comment-57131</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Patterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 03:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elharo.com/blog/mac/2007/03/25/apple-tv-why/#comment-57131</guid>
		<description>Bob Cringely thinks he knows and wrote about it in his weekly PBS.org column.

http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/2007/pulpit_20070216_001673.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob Cringely thinks he knows and wrote about it in his weekly PBS.org column.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/2007/pulpit_20070216_001673.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/2007/pulpit_20070216_001673.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey W. Baker</title>
		<link>http://www.elharo.com/blog/mac/2007/03/25/apple-tv-why/comment-page-1/#comment-57046</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey W. Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 18:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elharo.com/blog/mac/2007/03/25/apple-tv-why/#comment-57046</guid>
		<description>I think cracking it open and hacking it is pretty much the entire point.  It has most of the features of a mac mini, plus some extras, at half the price, in a package only half as large and without the external power brick.  It will run Mac OS or any other full-blown operating system.  So it can basically do whatever you want it to do.  That seems like enough reason to me.

I tend to agree that the included software and the state purpose are pointless.  But in the context of the quest for compact and quiet computers, this is an excellent product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think cracking it open and hacking it is pretty much the entire point.  It has most of the features of a mac mini, plus some extras, at half the price, in a package only half as large and without the external power brick.  It will run Mac OS or any other full-blown operating system.  So it can basically do whatever you want it to do.  That seems like enough reason to me.</p>
<p>I tend to agree that the included software and the state purpose are pointless.  But in the context of the quest for compact and quiet computers, this is an excellent product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

