<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chronicles of Narnia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.elharo.com/blog/pop-culture/movies/2006/01/02/chronicles-of-narnia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.elharo.com/blog/pop-culture/movies/2006/01/02/chronicles-of-narnia/</link>
	<description>Ranting and Raving</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 19:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.elharo.com/blog/pop-culture/movies/2006/01/02/chronicles-of-narnia/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 03:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.elharo.com/blog/?p=71#comment-72</guid>
		<description>If the story was "truly hideous", why is it not the "one real flaw" ???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the story was &#8220;truly hideous&#8221;, why is it not the &#8220;one real flaw&#8221; ???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Morelli</title>
		<link>http://www.elharo.com/blog/pop-culture/movies/2006/01/02/chronicles-of-narnia/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Morelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 16:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.elharo.com/blog/?p=71#comment-71</guid>
		<description>At least in still cameras, there's something known as the hyperfocal distance, which maximises the "in focus" area. Depending on the distance of the near subject, both near and far could be in focus...

http://www.dofmaster.com/hyperfocal.html
http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/hyperfocal-distance.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least in still cameras, there&#8217;s something known as the hyperfocal distance, which maximises the &#8220;in focus&#8221; area. Depending on the distance of the near subject, both near and far could be in focus&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dofmaster.com/hyperfocal.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.dofmaster.com/hyperfocal.html</a><br />
<a href="http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/hyperfocal-distance.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/hyperfocal-distance.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Cowan</title>
		<link>http://www.elharo.com/blog/pop-culture/movies/2006/01/02/chronicles-of-narnia/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>John Cowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2006 21:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.elharo.com/blog/?p=71#comment-69</guid>
		<description>Note the difference between video, where nearly everything &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; in focus thanks to the depth of field, and actual film, where focus is almost as sharp as it is for the eye.  But because the eye moves rapidly, unlike the camera, we &lt;i&gt;think&lt;/i&gt; everything is in focus all the time even when it really is not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note the difference between video, where nearly everything <i>is</i> in focus thanks to the depth of field, and actual film, where focus is almost as sharp as it is for the eye.  But because the eye moves rapidly, unlike the camera, we <i>think</i> everything is in focus all the time even when it really is not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speven Steilberg</title>
		<link>http://www.elharo.com/blog/pop-culture/movies/2006/01/02/chronicles-of-narnia/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Speven Steilberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2006 13:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.elharo.com/blog/?p=71#comment-63</guid>
		<description>What? We're going to spend all that money on creating that background and then make it blurry? Are you nuts? See these statues here? I didn't get them by making blurry movies, fer chrissakes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What? We&#8217;re going to spend all that money on creating that background and then make it blurry? Are you nuts? See these statues here? I didn&#8217;t get them by making blurry movies, fer chrissakes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
