http://www.elharo.com/blog/software-development/web-development/2006/10/31/would-you-buy-a-used-web-conference-from-these-folks/ Ranting and Raving Tue, 02 Dec 2008 20:39:14 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 http://www.elharo.com/blog/software-development/web-development/2006/10/31/would-you-buy-a-used-web-conference-from-these-folks/#comment-18297 Jonathan Tappan Wed, 01 Nov 2006 15:43:00 +0000 http://www.elharo.com/blog/software-development/web-development/2006/10/31/would-you-buy-a-used-web-conference-from-these-folks/#comment-18297 I would argue that PDF is more widely accessible than Word format. Try opening a Word document on a Linux machine, or for that matter a Windows machine that has an older version of Word installed. And PDF does a better job of handling fill-in fields and makes it much harder for the recipient to randomly alter the terms of the contract. I would argue that PDF is more widely accessible than Word format. Try opening a Word document on a Linux machine, or for that matter a Windows machine that has an older version of Word installed. And PDF does a better job of handling fill-in fields and makes it much harder for the recipient to randomly alter the terms of the contract.

]]> http://www.elharo.com/blog/software-development/web-development/2006/10/31/would-you-buy-a-used-web-conference-from-these-folks/#comment-18284 John Cowan Wed, 01 Nov 2006 13:58:23 +0000 http://www.elharo.com/blog/software-development/web-development/2006/10/31/would-you-buy-a-used-web-conference-from-these-folks/#comment-18284 To be fair, Word binary format is probably the most widely accessible format other than HTML, and if you want controlled content with fill-in fields, HTML doesn't cut it for something you sign and return, as opposed to fill out on line. To be fair, Word binary format is probably the most widely accessible format other than HTML, and if you want controlled content with fill-in fields, HTML doesn’t cut it for something you sign and return, as opposed to fill out on line.

]]>