<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Best Tools for Checking Web Accessibility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.elharo.com/blog/software-development/web-development/2007/03/14/best-tools-for-checking-web-accessibility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.elharo.com/blog/software-development/web-development/2007/03/14/best-tools-for-checking-web-accessibility/</link>
	<description>Ranting and Raving</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:01:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Orenchak, CISSP</title>
		<link>http://www.elharo.com/blog/software-development/web-development/2007/03/14/best-tools-for-checking-web-accessibility/comment-page-1/#comment-55406</link>
		<dc:creator>James Orenchak, CISSP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 16:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elharo.com/blog/software-development/web-development/2007/03/14/best-tools-for-checking-web-accessibility/#comment-55406</guid>
		<description>The tool that I&#039;ve used over and over again is Tidy (http://tidy.sourceforge.net/). Tidy won&#039;t fix all errors itself, but ii does fix errors that it&#039;s sure are bad and produces a list of which statements may be mistakes and where the statements are located.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The tool that I&#8217;ve used over and over again is Tidy (<a href="http://tidy.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow">http://tidy.sourceforge.net/</a>). Tidy won&#8217;t fix all errors itself, but ii does fix errors that it&#8217;s sure are bad and produces a list of which statements may be mistakes and where the statements are located.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.elharo.com/blog/software-development/web-development/2007/03/14/best-tools-for-checking-web-accessibility/comment-page-1/#comment-54637</link>
		<dc:creator>stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elharo.com/blog/software-development/web-development/2007/03/14/best-tools-for-checking-web-accessibility/#comment-54637</guid>
		<description>They&#039;re all terrible.  Bobby was tolerable when it was being developed by CAST, but Watchfire has destroyed it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re all terrible.  Bobby was tolerable when it was being developed by CAST, but Watchfire has destroyed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Augusto Sellhorn</title>
		<link>http://www.elharo.com/blog/software-development/web-development/2007/03/14/best-tools-for-checking-web-accessibility/comment-page-1/#comment-54411</link>
		<dc:creator>Augusto Sellhorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 16:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elharo.com/blog/software-development/web-development/2007/03/14/best-tools-for-checking-web-accessibility/#comment-54411</guid>
		<description>The only tool I&#039;m familiar with and used to play with was &quot;Bobby&quot;.

One thing is for sure, don&#039;t include that in your list. Just checked it out again and it&#039;s totally change and doesn&#039;t seem to work at all (it&#039;s called Watchfire WebXACT).

Sorry I guess that&#039;s a negative recommendation, not really what you were looking for but still ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only tool I&#8217;m familiar with and used to play with was &#8220;Bobby&#8221;.</p>
<p>One thing is for sure, don&#8217;t include that in your list. Just checked it out again and it&#8217;s totally change and doesn&#8217;t seem to work at all (it&#8217;s called Watchfire WebXACT).</p>
<p>Sorry I guess that&#8217;s a negative recommendation, not really what you were looking for but still &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

