{"id":1003599,"date":"2011-01-15T22:12:16","date_gmt":"2011-01-16T03:12:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.elharo.com\/blog\/?p=1003599"},"modified":"2011-03-27T04:30:06","modified_gmt":"2011-03-27T09:30:06","slug":"canon-70-200-f2-8l-is-ii","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.elharo.com\/blog\/photography\/2011\/01\/15\/canon-70-200-f2-8l-is-ii\/","title":{"rendered":"Canon 70-200 f\/2.8L IS II"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;d been hearing good things about the relatively new Canon 70-200 f\/2.8L IS II lens. In particular with a 2X teleconverter a lot of folks seem to think it outperforms the Canon 100-400 zoom as a handheld bird lens, so this weekend I rented one, hooked it up to my 50D, and took it for a stroll in the park. In no particular order here are my first impressions:<br \/>\n<!--more--><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>70-200mm is not a very interesting range for me. It&#8217;s too long for buildings, landscapes, pets, and anything inside my apartment and too short for birds. Perhaps tomorrow I&#8217;ll try it at the zoo, where it may work better (big animals at medium distance.)<\/li>\n<li>When you can get close enough to the bird to not need more than 200mm, this lens is <em>sharp<\/em>, possibly the sharpest lens I&#8217;ve ever used.  Just look at this chickadee (make sure the window is wide enough for the full image for maximum effect):\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.elharo.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/01\/chickadee1.jpg\" alt=\"1:1 crop of a Black-capped Chickadee\" title=\"\" width=\"1089\" height=\"726\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-1003615\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.elharo.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/01\/chickadee1.jpg 1089w, https:\/\/www.elharo.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/01\/chickadee1-150x100.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.elharo.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/01\/chickadee1-900x600.jpg 900w, https:\/\/www.elharo.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/01\/chickadee1-1024x682.jpg 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1089px) 100vw, 1089px\" \/>\n<\/li>\n<li>My biggest problem was focus. A lot of shots (though not all) seem to be a little out of focus. Possibly this copy of the lens front-focuses a bit on this body? I have not tried to autofocus microadjust it yet. Also f\/2.8 has way less depth of field than I&#8217;m used to. I seem to get better results around f\/5.6-f\/8. (Also worth noting: the 50D does not have state-of-the-art autofocus. The 7D and 1D Mark IV are both noticeably improved here.)<\/li>\n<li>Adding the 2X Mark II teleconverter softens the image. It&#8217;s noticeably less sharp at f\/5.6 than a 100-400mm or 400mm f\/5.6L lens, though it does have much better maximum magnification and minimum focusing distance. Sharpness picks up a little at f\/8. It may be better with the 2X Mark III though. <\/li>\n<li>I find the push pull zoom of the 100-400 a lot easier to manage than the twist zoom of the 70-200. Some folks feel otherwise, I know. <\/li>\n<li>Adding\/removing a teleconverter in the field is possible, but nontrivial. Still, 140-400 is not a bad range; and quite competitive with the 100-400. There were shots I missed because I did or did not have the teleconverter on at the wrong time. <\/li>\n<li>From 70-200mm (i.e. without a teleconverter) this lens is about two stops faster than the 100-400. In fact, it&#8217;s as fast as any zoom lens I know of. Only a few primes are faster. For wild birds I don&#8217;t need this, but it was helpful indoors at the zoo.<\/li>\n<li>The image stabilization does help. Though subject motion was often a problem, I rarely felt like I couldn&#8217;t hold the lens steady enough for the shot. I didn&#8217;t have to worry about the shutter speed. Aside from subject motion, 1\/100s or faster was fine for this lens. (Of course, I&#8217;d do better still with a camera body with better high ISO such as  the 7D or 1D Mark IV. I don&#8217;t like to shoot the 50D above ISO 400, and prefer ISO 200 if the light allows.) <\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>And a couple of points probably not specifically related to this lens:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Use flash at the feeders. The difference is like night and day, though I should try this without a teleconverter at f\/2.8. However there was a large group of folks there today so I didn&#8217;t get too close. (Lens aside, I really need to get more comfortable with flash, both as fill and main light. I&#8217;m just not fluent with what to use when, and even when I know how much of what kind of flash I want, I have real trouble figuring out which buttons to push to make it happen. In fact, the last time I tried to shoot indoors, I mucked the flash up so badly I had to do a factory reset on the camera to recover.)<\/li>\n<li>Must remember to use manual exposure mode for flight photography. Backgrounds change too rapidly to keep up with exposure compensation in Av mode.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Bottom Line: this is not a bad combination, and just maybe better than the 100-400, though it&#8217;s not as obvious to me as to some other folks who&#8217;ve tried this. If you want a 70-200 lens, then buying a 2X teleconverter makes way more sense than buying an extra 100-400 lens, or even a 400mm f\/5.6. However if you primarily want a 400mm lens, then the answer is not so apparent. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;d been hearing good things about the relatively new Canon 70-200 f\/2.8L IS II lens. In particular with a 2X teleconverter a lot of folks seem to think it outperforms the Canon 100-400 zoom as a handheld bird lens, so this weekend I rented one, hooked it up to my 50D, and took it for [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[96],"tags":[143,116,124,407],"class_list":["post-1003599","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-photography","tag-50d","tag-birds","tag-lens","tag-photography"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.elharo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1003599","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.elharo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.elharo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.elharo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.elharo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1003599"}],"version-history":[{"count":20,"href":"https:\/\/www.elharo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1003599\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1003619,"href":"https:\/\/www.elharo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1003599\/revisions\/1003619"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.elharo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1003599"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.elharo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1003599"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.elharo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1003599"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}