#419 Red-necked Phalarope in Two Counties

This was one of those tricky lifers. You’re not quite sure when you saw it first because you’re not quite sure about the first sighting. I think my first Red-necked Phalarope was at San Joaquin Wildlife Refuge on April 27. However those birds weren’t in breeding plumage, and I didn’t have a scope. I can’t say with absolute certainty that they weren’t Wilson’s Phalaropes (though I do think they matched Red-necked much more closely.)

Phalarope at San Joaquin, Pond A

Fortunately just a few days later I was in Santa Clara County on business, and as I like to do I went to Mountain View Shoreline before work. Usually I start out at the end of San Antonio road and walk around the lake. However, today I decided to take a different route and explore the area to the north along the 101. About halfway to the next exit, I found some ponds, and in one of them a flock of about 20 Red-necked Phalaropes were feeding. This time most of them were in full breeding plumage so even without a scope there was no doubt. I even got some recognizable pictures:

6 Red-necked Phalaropes feeding in water

Total species count for that morning was 28:

  • Canada Goose
  • Gadwall
  • Mallard
  • Cinnamon Teal
  • Northern Shoveler
  • Ruddy Duck
  • Pied-billed Grebe
  • American White Pelican
  • Double-crested Cormorant
  • Snowy Egret
  • White-tailed Kite
  • Common Moorhen
  • American Coot
  • Killdeer
  • Black-necked Stilt
  • American Avocet
  • Red-necked Phalarope
  • Ring-billed Gull
  • California Gull
  • Forster’s Tern
  • American Crow
  • Marsh Wren
  • Northern Mockingbird
  • Common Yellowthroat
  • Red-winged Blackbird
  • Bullock’s Oriole
  • House Finch
  • Lesser Goldfinch

I saw still more Phalaropes the next weekend back in Orange County, but that will have to wait for the next entry.

One Response to “#419 Red-necked Phalarope in Two Counties”

  1. reputation on fire Says:

    The short story is, people often should look for warrants
    for arrest, and however, looking at warrants for arrest
    may be troublesome. And simply because he pays Basic Fee Tax
    – like most UK taxpayers do – this tax reduction will mean a 136 funds refund (calculated as tax
    aid x standard tax rate through the six one year period).
    This is dangerous for all those arrested for computer
    crimes, and yes it should be determined if they
    are the particular perpetrator, or an innocent patsy whose computer was hijacked.

Leave a Reply