March 9th, 2007
C|Net accuses Apple of favoring iTunes songs over CD-ripped songs in iTunes random playlists. Unfortunately they don’t have the statistical chops to prove anything or do any real analysis:
It’s obviously difficult to tell whether back-room marketing deals or just dumb luck were responsible for the results we saw, but it appears that we can safely lend credence to the suspicions of myriad iPod users around the world. When it comes to choosing songs, ‘random’ clearly is relative.
Actually folks, it’s totally possible to figure out whether your results are random luck or not. For one thing, try repeating the experiment. But what you really need are better statistics. In particular try calculating the chance your results would occur by pure randomness. You haven’t published the raw data, so I can’t do it for you; but this should be well within the reach of anyone whose taken a couple of undergraduate courses in statistics. In fact, it would make a very nice final project for a statistics course. I don’t think it quite rises to the level of an undergraduate thesis though.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Math | 3 Comments »
March 8th, 2007
I’m about 99% certain that the various problems I’ve been having on my main desktop Mac lately can all be traced to a misbehaving LaCie d2 external hard drive. (I leave 1% open for the possibility it’s the FireWire cable or controller, but I really don’t think so.)
Partially I blame LaCie for this, and perhaps EMC, but mostly I blame Apple. There is no excuse for allowing a misbehaving external hard drive, from which I have not booted, to affect the operation of the rest of the system. Mac OS X should be robust against any signal, valid or otherwise, from external devices. It should be equally prepared to handle the case where a device does not respond within the expected time frame.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Mac | 2 Comments »
March 7th, 2007
I know what an HTML block level element is, but I’m damned if I can say it in a concise, correct, obvious way (which it so happens I need to do in Chapter 4 of Refactoring HTML). In HTML, block level elements include p, blockquote, div, table, ul, ol, dl, h1–h6, and a few others. Generally speaking a block element has a line break before and after it, but that’s really only true in a particualr visual representation. The notion of line breaks doesn’t make a lot of sense in a screen reader, for example.
The HTML 4.0.1 specification defines block elements thusly:
Certain HTML elements that may appear in BODY are said to be “block-level” while others are “inline” (also known as “text level”). The distinction is founded on
several notions:
- Content model
- Generally, block-level elements may contain inline elements and other
block-level elements. Generally, inline elements may contain only data and
other inline elements. Inherent in this structural distinction is the idea that
block elements create “larger” structures than inline elements.
- Formatting
- By default, block-level elements are formatted differently than inline
elements. Generally, block-level elements begin on new lines, inline elements
do not. For information about white space, line breaks, and block formatting,
please consult the section on text.
- Directionality
- For technical reasons involving the [UNICODE] bidirectional
text algorithm, block-level and inline elements differ in how they inherit
directionality information. For details, see the section on inheritance of text direction.
That’s not a great definition though. These seem more to be consequences rather than defining characteristics of block level elements.
Can anyone offer a more precise definition of block element that does not presume a particular rendering? Just what is a block anyway?
Posted in Web Development | 5 Comments »
March 6th, 2007
I’m just now realizing that the new earlier daylight savings time is going to play havoc with the planned Birding BoF at SD 2007 West in a couple of weeks. Sunrise isn’t going to happen till about 7:00 A.M., and I was planning to get going at 6:00.
Can anyone currently birding in Santa Clara County give me a heads up to let me know what’s the earliest you think we could reasonably start on March 21? We could push back the start time a little, but I don’t have much time before I have to get everyone back to the hotel for the 8:30 A.M. first session. Possibly instead of walking back to the hotel, we could simply bird Sunnyvale Baylands Park and then take cabs back. Here’s another question for locals: last year the park gates were open well before their scheduled opening time. Is that reliable? If we drive over, can we be confident we’ll be able to park?
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Birding | 2 Comments »
March 5th, 2007
According to State Farm,
The National Insurance Crime Bureau (NICB®) has compiled a list of the 10 vehicles most frequently reported stolen in the U.S. in 2005.
- 1991 Honda Accord
- 1995 Honda Civic
- 1989 Toyota Camry
- 1994 Dodge Caravan
- 1994 Nissan Sentra
- 1997 Ford F150 Series
- 1990 Acura Integra
- 1986 Toyota Pickup
- 1993 Saturn SL
- 2004 Dodge Ram Pickup
This doesn’t match my expectations at all. With the single exception of the 2004 Dodge Ram Pickup, these are all a decade old or older. Can anyone explain why?
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Economics | 13 Comments »
March 1st, 2007
Mostly the Migration Assistant in Mac OS X works, but there are some surprising things that don’t come across and have to be reinstalled manually. So far I’ve noticed:
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Mac | No Comments »